<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is obscene about art?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indiblog.com/295/what-is-obscene-about-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indiblog.com/295/what-is-obscene-about-art/</link>
	<description>The Pride of India</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna was a playboy, but an AIDS activist He wasn&#8217;t &#124; Aham</title>
		<link>http://indiblog.com/295/what-is-obscene-about-art/comment-page-1/#comment-23515</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna was a playboy, but an AIDS activist He wasn&#8217;t &#124; Aham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hihindu.com/?p=50#comment-23515</guid>
		<description>[...] previously argued advocating absolute freedom of expression in art. But when religious imagery is used to convey a social message, responsibility is important to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously argued advocating absolute freedom of expression in art. But when religious imagery is used to convey a social message, responsibility is important to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditya</title>
		<link>http://indiblog.com/295/what-is-obscene-about-art/comment-page-1/#comment-22076</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hihindu.com/?p=50#comment-22076</guid>
		<description>Well, let art be for art&#039;s sake, if the recent paintings have depicted any problem, then so be it. lets also understand that in a country like ours its also the freedom of speech that is important, and with the media around, it makes the job of the people easy, but on a personal note, there is nothing wrong with art, nudity is art is always pure art, we need to evolve and that would take some years as we are predominantly not used to nudity as art culturally!!!! but then this from a country that gave us the Kamasutra and Paintings of Lord in unusual fashion gives me jitters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let art be for art&#8217;s sake, if the recent paintings have depicted any problem, then so be it. lets also understand that in a country like ours its also the freedom of speech that is important, and with the media around, it makes the job of the people easy, but on a personal note, there is nothing wrong with art, nudity is art is always pure art, we need to evolve and that would take some years as we are predominantly not used to nudity as art culturally!!!! but then this from a country that gave us the Kamasutra and Paintings of Lord in unusual fashion gives me jitters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna was a playboy, but an AIDS activist, He wasn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://indiblog.com/295/what-is-obscene-about-art/comment-page-1/#comment-22062</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna was a playboy, but an AIDS activist, He wasn&#8217;t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hihindu.com/?p=50#comment-22062</guid>
		<description>[...] previously argued advocating absolute freedom of expression in art. But when religious imagery is used to convey a social message, responsibility is important to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously argued advocating absolute freedom of expression in art. But when religious imagery is used to convey a social message, responsibility is important to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
