At last editorials and opinions have started appearing in the Indian press on the Sourav Ganguly – Greg Chappell fight. The spat must be embarrassing for all involved, but as usual our press is taking every opportunity available to get all the spice and masala in their front pages.
The reporters are now after Gavaskar’s coffee chat, Tendulkar’s morning breath, and are looking under every stone with a magnifying lens to make the most of the affair. But of course, to be fair to the reporters, this fight seemed dirty right from the beginning.
An editorial in the Indian Express is all praise for Ganguly, while reasonably justifying that it is time for him to go. IE says that…
…Ganguly must have stepped down as soon as Zimbabwe was routed.
He must go, not merely because of Chappell’s e-mail, or a falling average, or one run-in too many with authority, or for violating the basic ethic of team sport: making public dressing-room disputes. He must go because Indian cricket needs a change.
Ganguly is visibly upset and wishes that Chappell would not have made that comment. That is quite silly of him, for last I heard, India is still a free country!
“I cannot stop Greg Chappell from giving comments from his point of view,” Ganguly said. “I honestly don’t know why he has done this, why he has made such a comment.”
Though Ganguly could have hoped that Chappell would first discuss things with him and BCCI in person without resorting to a written complaint, Ganguly gave away that right as he was the first to run to the press like a naughty child with their dressing-room discussions!
The row broke during the first Test in Bulawayo last week after Ganguly, having hit his first Test hundred since November 2003, told the media that Chappell wanted him to sit out and play an in-form batsman.
Ganguly was criticised for breaching convention by making dressing room discussions public. Chappell then said he had intended only to motivate the player.
What’s your say? Should Ganguly be kicked out?
A policy is a temporary creed liable to be changed, but while it holds good it has got to be pursued with apostolic zeal.